light 4-weight M&L 1-2 heifers$151.05/cwt+1.05 vs last sale · ≈ $621/hd at 411 lb · 12 head
light 4-weight M&L 1-2 bulls$154.65/cwt+2.09 vs last sale · ≈ $670/hd at 433 lb · 10 head
heavy 4-weight M&L 1-2 bulls$155.71/cwt+4.73 vs last sale · ≈ $732/hd at 470 lb · 10 head
Receipts
Head
This sale
Last sale
Last year
Total receipts
275
237
277
Feeder cattle
193
138
174
Slaughter cattle
59
75
93
Replacement cattle
11
11
3
Market comments — USDA reporter
Compared to two weeks ago, breaking type slaughter cows were 4.00 to 5.00 higher, boning type slaughter cows were steady to 1.00 higher, and slaughter bulls were 8.00 to 9.00 higher. Feeder steers and bulls were mostly 1.00 to 3.00 higher; there were too few comparable heifers to establish an adequate market comparison. Demand was good; market activity and buyer interest were moderate. Offerings of cattle were mostly moderate. Cattle quality was average.
USDA feeder grades describe frame size and muscle thickness, not quality of
the individual animal. "Medium and Large" is the frame score; the number is
muscle (1 = heaviest muscled). "Medium and Large 1–2" pens mix both muscle
scores — common across the Southeast.
What is $/cwt?
Dollars per hundredweight — per 100 lb of animal. A 500-lb calf at
$450/cwt brings 5 × $450 = $2,250. Lighter cattle usually bring more per
cwt but less per head.
Why are some prices per head?
Bred cows, cow-calf pairs, and some replacement classes sell by the
head, not by weight. We show those exactly as USDA reports them — a
$/head figure is never converted into $/cwt on this site.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the USDA Agricultural Marketing Service's Livestock Market News —
federal reporters at the sale. We publish each report in full and link the
official USDA document at the top of the page.
Compared to two weeks ago, breaking type slaughter cows were 4.00 to 5.00 higher, boning type slaughter cows were steady to 1.00 higher, and slaughter bulls were 8.00 to 9.00 higher. Feeder steers and bulls were mostly 1.00 to 3.00 higher; there were too few comparable heifers to establish an adequate market comparison. Demand was good; market activity and buyer interest were moderate. Offerings of cattle were mostly moderate. Cattle quality was average.