light 4-weight M&L 1 bulls$443.56/cwt+33.47 vs last sale · ≈ $1,881/hd at 424 lb · 12 head
Receipts
Head
This sale
Last sale
Last year
Total receipts
350
207
245
Feeder cattle
249
141
188
Slaughter cattle
38
43
42
Replacement cattle
63
23
15
Market comments — USDA reporter
Compared to last week, slaughter cows sold 8.00 to 12.00 lower with limited comparable receipts available for slaughter bulls, but a sharply lower undertone noted. No market trends available for feeder cattle due to limited comparable receipts, but overall low-quality offerings was noted.
→ Feeder cattle: No market trends available for feeder cattle due to limited comparable receipts
▼ Slaughter bulls: slaughter cows sold 8.00 to 12.00 lower with limited comparable receipts available for slaughter bulls
▼ Slaughter cows: slaughter cows sold 8.00 to 12.00 lower with limited comparable receipts available for slaughter bulls
USDA feeder grades describe frame size and muscle thickness, not quality of
the individual animal. "Medium and Large" is the frame score; the number is
muscle (1 = heaviest muscled). "Medium and Large 1–2" pens mix both muscle
scores — common across the Southeast.
What is $/cwt?
Dollars per hundredweight — per 100 lb of animal. A 500-lb calf at
$450/cwt brings 5 × $450 = $2,250. Lighter cattle usually bring more per
cwt but less per head.
Why are some prices per head?
Bred cows, cow-calf pairs, and some replacement classes sell by the
head, not by weight. We show those exactly as USDA reports them — a
$/head figure is never converted into $/cwt on this site.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the USDA Agricultural Marketing Service's Livestock Market News —
federal reporters at the sale. We publish each report in full and link the
official USDA document at the top of the page.
Compared to last week, slaughter cows sold 8.00 to 12.00 lower with limited comparable receipts available for slaughter bulls, but a sharply lower undertone noted. No market trends available for feeder cattle due to limited comparable receipts, but overall low-quality offerings was noted.